Pakistani people are dying while sitting in a land full of riches. Perhaps this is the horrid yet true picture of reality in most developing countries in the world.
Pakistan covers an area of 796,095 km2 (307,374 sq mi), approximately equaling the combined land areas of France and the United Kingdom. It is the 36th largest nation by total area although this ranking varies depending on how the disputed territory of Kashmir is counted. Apart from the 1,046 km (650 mi) coastline along the Arabian Sea, The country is strategically located between South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East. Land is a valuable natural resource which include an extensive natural gas supply, some oil, hydro power potential, coal (although not high quality), iron ore, copper, salt, and limestone. Agricultural products are wheat, cotton, rice, sugarcane, eggs, fruit, vegetables, milk, beef, and mutton. Primary industry includes textiles, food processing, pharmaceuticals, construction materials, shrimp, fertilizer, and paper products. Major exports are textiles, rice, leather goods, sports goods, carpets, rugs, and chemicals. Pakistan imports petroleum, machinery, plastic, edible oil, iron, steel, tea, and paper.
Many Pakistanis are proud of their motherland. Every elementary school student is taught that the country is rich in natural resources. The citizens’ pride is rooted in the fact that the country is geopolitically important and can survive on its own – unlike Singapore, for example, which basically lives from its neighbors’ resources.
Ironically, these same children have to grow up witnessing or experiencing extreme poverty. This is more painful given the dreams they hold after being taught about the tishness of their land.
There is a long list of cases in which corporations – local and foreign – exploited and polluted the land, leaving toxic waste behind for the local people. From the human rights violations and destruction of peoples’ livelihoods caused by mining companies, to the environmental damage by the lather industry in Karachi, to a plethora of cases of mercuric materials in drinking reservoirs, corporations have brought evil consequences to Pakistani people.
Joseph Stiglitz, the 2001 Nobel Prize recipient for economic sciences, famously remarked, “Most countries with large (production) of natural resources do more poorly than those without, which is an irony.” The film “Blood Diamond” depicts a related situation in Africa, where exploration for diamonds institutes a civil war, disrupts a nation’s political stability and subjects its people to torment and anguish. One character vividly remarks, “I hope they do not find any more diamonds, otherwise we will start killing each other”. The same is for Pakistan where we that we would not find any more natural resources, otherwise we will start killing each other again.
Though it may sound treacherous, at some points I almost wish this land were poor – and that may indeed be the wish of many Pakistanis. The very inception of economic principles stems from resource scarcity; that is why their core mantra is one advocating efficiency in modes of production.
Imagine if the world provided sufficient natural resources that people could simply pick basic necessities – food, water, housing materials and clothes – from their immediate surroundings. In that scenario, economic principles may not even be needed. There are several caveats to ponder.
First, is it even true that our world does not provide sufficient resources to make this a reality? Is it even the case that resources are scarce, or is it human activity – greed, pure and simple – that makes it so? Humans always want to have what others have, even if they have more. Is it axiomatic that nature cannot naturally reproduce resources that humans have consumed?
Second, assuming that natural resources are scarce by nature, not by human greed, is it morally acceptable to suggest that those who are the most efficient at production get the biggest share of natural resources, while others who are less eficient should live at their mercy?
This is not to suggest that there is no place for economic principles, but they are not without flaws and not without vested interests. I would argue that those deficiencies manifest as the root cause of the torment many developing countries are suffering.
The very idea of insufficiency, or “resource scarcity,” pushes those with so-called “technology and capacity” to take over the management of the world’s resources; the idea of not having enough makes them look elsewhere. Natural resources become the prima donna, and everyone fights over her.
Without the technology and capacity developed countries command, developing countries will always lose in a game of resource management and accumulation. That is why in the fields of oil, gas and mineral exctraction, developing countries rabidly engage in joint venture agreements with foreign corporations from developed countries. The popular myth is that without foreign corporations, developing countries would not be able to extract these resources.
Could you imagin that Pakistan recently discovered one low and four low-to-medium quality coal seams in the Punjab. Low sulfur coal was recently reported at the Baluchistan and near Islamabad. Bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite coal have been found in Pakistan.
Do you know that;
· Pakistan recently discovered one low and four low-to-medium quality coal seams in the Punjab. Low sulfur coal was recently reported at the Baluchistan and near Islamabad. Bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite coal have been found in Pakistan.
Coal reserves are estimated at 175 billion tons. This would equate to 618 billion barrels of crude oil. When compared to oil reserves his is more than twice the amount of the top four countries. If At KSA’s current usage, the reserves would last more than 200 years.
· Natural gas production is at a high level in Pakistan. Estimated reserves are 885.3 billion cubic meters (as of January 2009). Gas fields are expected to last for another 20 years. The Sui gas field is the largest, accounting for 26% of Pakistan’s gas production. Daily production is 19 million cubic meters a day. Under the barren mountains of Balochistan and the sands of Sindh, there are untouched oil and gas reserves.
· Forests are limited to 4% of Pakistan’s land; nonetheless the forests are a main source of food, lumber, paper, fuel wood, latex, and medicine. The forests are also used for wildlife conversation and ecotourism.
· Pakistan has large gold/copper ore deposits at Saindak. There are large deposits of rock salt in the Pothohar Plateau. Pakistan’s mineral resources include reserves of gypsum, limestone, chromites, iron ore, rock salt, silver, precious stones, gems, marbles, tiles, sulfur, fire clay, and silica sand.
· About 28% of Pakistan’s total land area is under cultivation. Pakistan boasts one of the largest irrigation systems in the world. According to Wikipedia, “the most important crops are cotton, wheat, rice, sugarcane, maize, sorghum, millets, pulses, oil seeds, barley, fruits and vegetables, which together account for more than 75% of the value of total crop output.” The fertile lands of Punjab are ready to feed a population twice that of current Pakistan.
· Pakistan has a long history of exporting small amounts of uranium. In 2006 Pakistan produced about 45 tons of uranium.
· The fishing industry plays a role in the national economy of Pakistan. The coastline is 814km and fishery resources still have room to grow. Fishing in Pakistan is a major source of export earnings.
But for every exploration we have to look towards other countries. Perhaps it would remind you about the Saindak Metals and many more alike.
According to economic schemas imported by developed countries, developing countries would not be able to extract those things “efficiently.” In reality, the uneven playing field is exploited by huge corporations that wield mighty bargaining power in their domestic econo-political arrangements – which in Pakistan are called “corruption” and dictate the share division of natural resources and the procedural rules for their extraction.
The practical implications are not only frowned upon, but also suffered by many people in Pakistan. That is the cancer of the irony: people die sitting atop the riches of their lands, not because nature does not provide enough, but purely because of unrestrained human greed.
